Goals aligned, roles locked, timeline clear—now we build
Why Warsaw mattered
First meetings set the rules of the game. We used the day to translate the proposal into a working system with dates, names, and acceptance criteria. No fluff—only what ships.
Decisions that unblock delivery
- Research → IOD runs surveys/focus groups; draft item bank by Week 6.
- Assessment → Item pool → pilot → validation (α ≥ 0.75), language checks across EN/NL/PL/NO/EE.
- Platform → Vidipost leads UX/dev; 12 compact modules with video, readings, and interactive tasks.
- Content split → FURIM life-skills modules; SSOO and IOD split the rest.
- Data & privacy → DPIA baseline, consent flows, analytics anonymised, EU hosting.
- Comms → FURIM owns dissemination; cadence: monthly blog, quarterly newsletter.
Milestones
- M1: User research complete, draft question bank ready.
- M2: Assessment prototype + pilot plan.
- M3: Beta platform with 6 modules.
- M4: Full 12 modules, test suite green, certificates enabled.
Risks and guards
Recruitment shortfall, dev slippage, and translation delays are the big three. We added NGO MoUs, freeze dates, and a glossary + back-translation process.
What’s next
User interviews start, UX wireframes follow, and we open a call for pilot participants. Build mode: on.
